The meeting held at the Reef Hotel brought together a diverse group of stakeholders to discuss the proposed nuclear energy program in Kenya. Representing coastal communities, environmental organizations, and anti-nuclear advocacy groups, attendees engaged in a critical examination of the shift towards cleaner energy alternatives.

Led by Laureate Phyllis Omido, anti-nuclear advocates expressed grave concerns about the risks and costs associated with Kenya’s proposed nuclear program. They emphasized the disproportionate burden that such a program would place on a country already grappling with economic challenges. Moreover, they highlighted the lack of transparency and public participation in the decision-making process, citing disregard for constitutional provisions and the rights of local communities.

In stark contrast, proponents of the nuclear program, including officials from the National Environment Authority and the Ministry of Energy, exhibited an authoritarian approach to implementation. The CEO and PS for energy were quoted as forcefully demanding the displacement of communities to make way for nuclear power plant construction. They were accused of orchestrating sham public participation meetings, handpicking individuals to rubber stamp decisions without genuine community involvement.

Nupea officials, proponents of the nuclear program, were criticized for spreading misinformation about the benefits and safety of nuclear energy. They falsely claimed that the nuclear power plant would enhance medical facilities and technology in Kenya, despite lacking evidence to support these claims. Additionally, they downplayed the risks associated with nuclear waste, misleadingly suggesting that it could be handled without fear.

Overall, the meeting underscored the urgent need for transparent, inclusive, and evidence-based decision-making in Kenya’s energy sector. Anti-nuclear advocates reiterated their commitment to opposing the nuclear program and advocating for safer, cleaner, and more sustainable energy alternatives. They called on the government to prioritize the well-being of communities and the environment, rather than pursuing nuclear energy at the expense of public health and safety.